Stephen Miller calls whistleblower a ‘partisan hit job’ in fiery interview

Stephen Miller calls whistleblower a ‘partisan hit job’ in fiery interview


>>Chris: KEVIN CORKE REPORTING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE, THANKS FOR THAT. JOINING US NOW, STEPHEN MILLER, SENIOR ADVISOR TO THE PRESIDENT, WELCOME BACK TO “FOX NEWS SUNDAY.”>>THANKS FOR HAVING ME, CHRIS.>>Chris: LET’S START WITH THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC SUBPOENAS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF A MASSIVE SET OF DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS FIVE WITNESSES FOR THIS WEEK. IT WILL PRESIDENT TRUMP COMPLY WITH THE HOUSE SUBPOENA?>>TO>>Stephen: THAT’S GOING TO BE BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEYS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S OFFICE AND THE HOUSE COMMITTEE. I HAVE NO NEWS UNFORTUNATELY TO MAKE ON THAT ISSUE BUT WHAT I DO WANT TO SAY IS THAT I THINK IT’S UNFORTUNATE THAT THE MEDIA CONTINUES TO DESCRIBE THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A WHISTLE-BLOWER AND HONORIFIC THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL MOST CERTAINLY DOES NOT DESERVE. A PARTISAN HIT JOB DOES NOT MAKE YOU A WHISTLE-BLOWER JUST BECAUSE YOU GO THROUGH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER PROTECTION ACT.>>Chris: WELL, FIRST OF ALL, HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS A PARTISAN HIT JOB, AND HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT A WHISTLE-BLOWER IN FACT UNDER DNI, THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE RULES — WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT, LET’S GO BACK TO THIS, AND WE’RE GOING TO JUMP AROUND A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I DIDN’T KNOW YOU WERE GOING TO GO HERE. HERE IS THE COMMENT FROM THE DNI, THE ACTING DNI BEFORE CONGRESS, JOE MAGUIRE, IN HIS TESTIMONY THIS WEEK, TAKE A LOOK.>>I BELIEVE THAT THE WHISTLE-BLOWER AND THE INSPECTOR GENERAL HAVE ACTED IN GOOD FAITH THROUGHOUT. I HAVE EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE DONE EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK AND FOLLOW THE LAW.>>Chris: THAT IS THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, JOE MAGUIRE, A LIFETIME SERVANT OF THIS COUNTRY, A NAVY SEAL, HE SAYS THAT THE WHISTLE-BLOWER WAS ACTING IN GOOD FAITH AND ACTION BY THE BOOK. ON WHAT BASIS DO YOU SAY THAT THIS WAS A PARTISAN HIT JOB?>>Stephen: FIRST OF ALL, IF YOU READ THE SEVEN-PAGE NANCY DREW NOVEL FOR THE WHISTLE-BLOWER PUT TOGETHER, IT DRIPS WITH CONDESCENSION, RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION AND CONTEMPT FOR THE PRESIDENT. IT’S ALSO LUDICROUS ON ITS FACE. IT DESCRIBES AN ELABORATE COVER-UP THAT ALSO, BY THE WAY, THE PRESIDENT DISCUSSED ON SEAN HANNITY, APRIL 25TH. WHAT KIND OF SECRET COVER OF ARE YOU ALSO DISCUSSING ON THE AIRWAVES OF FOX NEWS? FURTHERMORE, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOUND EVIDENCE OF POLITICAL BIAS IN THE INDIVIDUAL, WHICH IS NOT DISPUTED BY ANYBODY –>>Chris: WAIT A MINUTE. HE ALSO — BOTH THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INSPECTOR GENERAL SAID THEY ALSO FOUND HIS COMMENTS TO BE CREDIBLE AND A MATTER OF URGENT CONCERN AND THEY TURNED IT OVER TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, SO DESPITE ALL THAT, THEY THOUGHT THAT THIS WAS A CREDIBLE — A COMPLAINT.>>Stephen: AND THEY ARE WRONG.>>Chris: ON WHOSE BASIS?>>Stephen: I WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NOW FOR NEARLY THREE YEARS. I KNOW AT THE DEEP STATE LOOKS LIKE. I KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHISTLE-BLOWER AND A DEEP STATE OPERATIVE. THIS IS A DEEP STATE OPERATIVE, PURE AND SIMPLE. PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T BEEN IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WHO HAVEN’T WORKED IN THE WHITE HOUSE MEMO MAY NOT APPRECIATE THIS BUT THE SITUATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNTUATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELATION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECION AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECTON AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF UNELECTED AS YOU HAVE A GROUP OF BUREAUCRATS WHO THINK THAT THEY NEED TO TAKE DOWN THIS PRESIDENT. I’LL ATTEND INTERAGENCY MEETINGS WHERE I KNOW FOR CERTAIN FACT IF I DON’T BUY THE RIGHT PEOPLE AT THE MEETING WILL LEAK. IF I DON’T SAY THE RIGHT THING, IT WILL GO TO THE HILL. IF WE PROPOSE A POLICY IDEA THAT THEY DON’T APPROVE OF, THEY WILL WORK WITH DEMOCRATIC APPROPRIATORS TO TRY TO BLOCK IT. IF THEY LICK THIS PRESIDENT’S PHONE CALLS, THE PUBLISHER HIT PIECES, THEY PUBLISH FAKE STORIES. THEY’VE BEEN DOING THIS CONTINUOUSLY FOR NEARLY THREE YEARS AND THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR AGENDA IS CLEAR. THIS IS ABOUT DO YOU WANT A DEMOCRACY IN THIS COUNTRY OR DO YOU WANT A DEEP STATE. IT’S A BINARY CHOICE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.>>Chris: AGAIN, THIS PERSON YOU ARE ACCUSING THEM ALL THE SCUM OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, JOE MAGUIRE, A LIFELONG SERVANT OF THIS COUNTRY SAID WAS ACTING IN GOOD FAITH AND GOING BY THE BOOK. ENOUGH WITH THE RHETORIC, LET’S TALK ABOUT SOME SPECIFIC FACTS IN THIS. WHY DID PRESIDENT TRUMP USES PRIVATE ATTORNEY RUDY GIULIANI, AND AS WE JUST REPORTED, TO OTHER PRIVATE LAWYERS TO TRY TO DIG UP DIRT FROM THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT ON JOE BIDEN RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH HIS STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: FIRST OF ALL, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHEN WE COULD TALK ABOUT “DIGGING UP DIRT,” IT’S AN INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS. ONE OF TWO THINGS IS TRUE, CHRIS. EITHER THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT, OR PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH IT, POSSESS A REAL AND ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF CORRUPT DEALINGS BY THE BIDEN FAMILY, OR THEY DON’T. IF THEY DO, IS IT NOT IN THE INTEREST OF ALL AMERICANS TO KNOW THAT IS?>>Chris: WE ARE GOING TO GET TO THE BIDEN’S IN A MINUTE BUT I ASK YOU A SPECIFIC QUESTION, I’D LIKE A SPECIFIC ANSWER. THE PRESIDENT HAS THE STATE DEPARTMENT, HE’S GOT THE CIA, HE’S GOT THE PENTAGON, HE’S GOT A NUMBER OF OTHER AGENCIES. WHY DID HE USE THREE PRIVATE LAWYERS TO GET INFORMATION ON BIDEN FROM THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT RATHER THAN GO THROUGH ALL OF THE AGENCIES OF HIS GOVERNMENT?>>Stephen: TWO DIFFERENT POINTS.>>Chris: HOW ABOUT ANSWERING MY QUESTION?>>Stephen: JOHN DURHAM, AS YOU KNOW –>>Chris: WAIT A MINUTE, JOHN DURHAM IS INVESTIGATING SOME A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. I’M ASKING YOU A DIRECT QUESTION, WHAT ARE THE PRESIDENT USE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS RATHER THAN GO TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT? IF YOU DON’T KNOW, THAT’S AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER, BUT LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT JOHN DURHAM, WHO WAS INVESTIGATING THE TRUMP — SPEECH OF THEIR TWO ISSUES –>>Chris: WHY DID HE DO IT?>>Stephen: I UNDERSTAND. I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE YOUR QUESTION, I HAVE MY ANSWER. THERE’S TWO ISSUES THAT WERE BROUGHT UP A PHONE CALL –>>Chris: IT’S A NONANSWER AT THIS POINT.>>Stephen: THERE WERE TWO ISSUES BROUGHT UP IN THE PHONE CALL. ONE WAS UKRAINIAN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE COLLUSION INVESTIGATION THAT IS INFLICTED SO MUCH PAIN AND DAMAGE ON OUR COUNTRY. MY POINT IS THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS APPOINTED SOMEBODY FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO LOOK INTO THAT ISSUE. THEN THERE’S THE ADDITIONAL MATTER OF UKRAINIAN CORRUPTION, WHICH GIULIANI, AMONG OTHERS, ARE LOOKING AT. AND IT IS PROPER AND NATURAL FOR FRANKLY ANYBODY CONCERNED ABOUT THE FUTURE OF UKRAINE AND THE UNITED STATES TO WANT TO KNOW INFORMATION ABOUT CORRUPT DEALINGS. WHAT I FIND ASTONISHING, CHRIS, IS THAT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE SO ENRAGED ABOUT AN EFFORT TO FIND ANY TRUE AND ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF FOREIGN CROOK DEALINGS RELATED TO UKRAINE ARE THE SAME ONES WHO HAVE BEEN USING THE FOREIGN PRODUCED DOSSIER BY A BRITISH SPY TO PUT THIS COUNTRY THROUGH UNENDING POLITICAL TURMOIL. SPIRIT I’M ASKING QUESTION AS TO WHY — I’M SIMPLY ASKING YOU A QUESTION AS TO WHY THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T USE HIS GOVERNMENT. IF YOU APPARENTLY ARE NOT GOING TO ANSWER THAT, I WILL ASK ANOTHER QUESTION. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT DECIDE TO WITHHOLD $391 MILLION IN MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE LAST JULY? THAT HAD BEEN APPROVED BY CONGRESS?>>Stephen: THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN CLEAR AND CONSISTENT ON THIS ISSUE, NOT MERELY FOR THE TIME IS BEEN IN OFFICE, HIS WHOLE TIME AS A CANDIDATE AND FRANKLY DECADES BEFORE THAT.>>Chris: I SIMPLY ASKING WHY IN JULY DID THEY DECIDE TO WITHHOLD THE AID?>>Stephen: THE PROBLEM OF BURDEN SHARING IN UKRAINE AND WITH OUR NATO ALLIES, HE’S BEEN CLEAR AND CONSISTENT ON THIS ISSUE. PLUS THE MATTER OF UKRAINIAN CORRUPTION. FOR REASONS I CANNOT FATHOM, THE MEDIA, WHICH IS ORDINARILY INTERESTED IN SUNSHINE AND TRANSPARENCY ABOVE ALL ELSE, IS REMARKABLY UNSERIOUS ABOUT THE INFORMATION UKRAINE POSSESSES ABOUT THE CORRUPTION OF THE PREVIOUS AT ADMINISTRATION –>>Chris: OKAY, BUT LET’S JUST MAKE THIS POINT. IN MAY, AS PART OF A REGULAR INTERAGENCY PROCESS, IN MAY, TWO MONTHS BEFORE HE WITHHELD THE AID, THE PENTAGON CERTIFIED TO CONGRESS — CERTIFIED, A FORMAL PROCESS — CERTIFIED TO CONGRESS AFTER A RIGOROUS PROCESS AND AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT THAT UKRAINE HAD MADE DRAMATIC PROGRESS IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION AND THAT THE AID SHOULD BE RELEASED. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT, IF THE ARGUMENT IS CORRUPTION, WHY DID THE PRESIDENT GO AGAINST HIS OWN PENTAGON AND HIS OWN STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: CHRIS, I DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK A UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK K UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK T UNDERSTAND HOW YOU CAN ASK E QUESTION WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ADMONISHING THE PRESIDENT OR WANTING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF PERHAPS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CORRUPTION SCANDALS CONCERNING UKRAINE IN THE LAST FEW YEARS –>>Chris: ARE NOT ADMONISHING ANYBODY, ABSENTLY ASKING WHY DID HE — I MEAN THIS IS — WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, THIS IS AN EXERCISE IN OBFUSCATION. WHY DID THE PRESIDENT GO AGAINST HIS OWN PENTAGON AND STATE DEPARTMENT?>>Stephen: THERE’S A TONE OF JUDGMENT IN ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, SO YES, YOU ARE ADMONISHING –>>Chris: THAT’S JUDGMENT ON YOUR PART.>>Stephen: I CAN’T SPEAK TO EVERY MID-LEVEL AND LOW LEVEL BUREAUCRAT IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT –>>Chris: THIS IS THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. WHAT YOU CONSIDERED JOHN BROOD A MINYAN IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT? IN A PENTAGON?>>Stephen: IT’S THE PRESIDENT ‘HIS JOB AND SWORN DUTY TO SAFEGUARD TAXPAYER DOLLARS AND THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT’S FOREIGN POLICY. GETTING TO THE BOTTOM OF A CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN UKRAINE IS IN THE AMERICAN NATIONAL INTEREST IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY THAT COMPLAINT IS SO OBVIOUSLY POLITICALLY BIASED, WHEN HE SAYS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS THREATENING NATIONAL SECURITY BY TRYING TO EXPOSE CORRUPTION — WHEN HE SAYS, OR SHE, THAT THE PRESIDENT IS HURTING NATIONAL SECURITY BY TRYING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF A GIGANTIC SCANDAL THAT NOBODY HAS ON EARTH, THE PRESIDENT IS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER HERE. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS THE WHISTLE-BLOWER IN THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A SABOTEUR TRYING TO UNDERMINE A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT.>>Chris: SABOTEUR, IS HE A SPY? IS A COMMITTING TREASON?>>Stephen: I DO NOT KNOW –>>Chris: THE PRESIDENT SAID THAT, YOU KNOW.>>Stephen: THE PRESIDENT CORRECTLY POINTED OUT THAT THE BEHAVIOR OF THIS INDIVIDUAL IS CLOSE TO A SPY. I DON’T KNOW WHO THE INDIVIDUAL IS, ALL I KNOW IS AT SOME POINT, CHRIS, WE HAVE TO FOCUS THE REAL SCANDAL, WHICH IS THREE YEARS OF DEEP STATE SABOTAGE.>>Chris: I’M GOING TO TALK ABOUT A DIFFERENT SCANDAL AND YOU’LL BE VERY HAPPY THAT I’M HEADED A TEAR. THE PRESIDENT SAYS THE REAL STORY IS THE CORRUPTION BY VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN AND HIS SON HUNTER BIDEN, WHO WAS ON THE BOARD OF THE UKRAINIAN ENERGY COMPANY. HOW, SPECIFICALLY — I’M GOING TO GIVE YOU ONE MINUTE UNINTERRUPTED — HOW SPECIFICALLY TO THE BIDENS BREAK THE LAW IN UKRAINE?>>Stephen: THE BURISMA COMPANY, AS YOU KNOW, WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. IT HAS A UKRAINIAN OLIGARCH BEHIND IT WHO WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. WE KNOW THAT THERE WAS SEVERE CONCERNING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OF THE TIME ABOUT BIDEN BEING APPOINTED AS THE LEAD ON UKRAINIAN POLICY AND HIS SON GETTING A LUCRATIVE $50,000 A MONTH DEAL WITH THE COMPANY. THE SUN HAD NO EXPERIENCE IN THE LEGAL ISSUES –>>Chris: HOW DID YOU BREAK THE LAW?>>Stephen: KNEW NOTHING ABOUT UKRAINIAN LAW AND NOTHING ABOUT NATURAL GAS, THE ISSUE OF THE HEART OF THE COMPANY. THE BIDEN MEN THREATENED TO WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN AID UNLESS THE PROSECUTOR WAS FIRED.>>Chris: YOU REALIZE THAT ALSO THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, ALMOST EVERY OTHER GOVERNMENT IN THE WEST WAS ALSO ASKING FOR THAT PROSECUTOR TO BE FIRED AND THAT IN FACT, IN FACT, THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION GOING ON OF BURISMA, THE NAME OF THE COMPANY AT THAT TIME.>>Stephen: I DON’T KNOW THAT TO BE TRUE.>>Chris: IT IS TRUE.>>Stephen: I KNOW WHAT PEOPLE HAVE SAID BUT THE REALITY IS THAT WHY IS THE MEDIA SO OBSESSED WITH EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THIS INVESTIGATION BUT THEY DON’T WANT TO UNCOVER THE POTENTIAL CORRUPT DEALINGS OF HUNTER BIDEN AND HIS FATHER?>>Chris: I HAVE ONE LESS QUESTION TO ASK YOU AND I DO WANT TO PUT THIS ON –>>Stephen: WHILE THORNTON ABOUT CHINA?>>Chris: HERE IS THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF UKRAINE FOR THREE YEARS, INCLUDING THE PERIOD DURING WHICH PRESIDENT TRUMP SPOKE WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY IN JULY OF 2019. HERE HE IS THIS WEEK. TAKE A LOOK.>>I DON’T KNOW ANY VIOLATION OF UKRAINIAN LAW — ONCE AGAIN, UKRAINIAN LAW, BY BIDEN AND BIDEN JR.>>Chris: HE WAS THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL AT THE TIME THE PRESIDENT CALLED THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT — SAYS JOE BIDEN AND HIS SON DID NOTHING WRONG.>>Chris: IF YOU’RE GOING TO USE THEM AS A WITNESS YOU HAVE TO ALSO ANALOGIES MADE INCREDIBLY DAMNING ALLEGATIONS AGAINST UKRAINE AND THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVING THE ORIGINS OF THE 2016 RUSSIAN COLLUSION EXPERIENCE E. IF YOU’RE GOING TO USE A WITNESS YOU HAVE TO TAKE ALL OF IT ARE NONE OF IT. YOU CAN’T PICK AND CHOOSE, IT’S NOT A BUFFET.>>Chris: OKAY, BUT I GUESS THE POINT IS IF HE IS CLEARLY SAYING THOSE THINGS ABOUT UKRAINE AND THE 2016 ELECTION, HE’S NOT CARRYING WATER FOR JOE BIDEN, HE SAYS JOE BIDEN — YOU CAN’T PICK OR CHOOSE EITHER.>>Stephen: I’M NOT.>>Chris: YOUR SAYING “WE AGREE WITH HIM ON THIS BUT WE DON’T ON THE OTHER.” WELCOME TO THE BUFFET.>>Stephen: I’M SAYING AN INVESTIGATION IS URGENTLY NEEDED WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PATTERN OF FACTS BUT THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT POINT IS THIS. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN 2016 SAID WE WANT IN A COMPLETELY NEW DIRECTION FOR OUR COUNTRY. THEY ELECTED NEW LAWMAKERS AND THEY ELECTED A NEW PRESIDENT TO DELIVER THAT DIRECTION. HE’S THE THE SOLE ELECTED PERSON IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.>>Chris: THAT’S NOT TRUE. IT GOT THE VICE PRESIDENT AS WELL.>>Stephen: YES. THE ALL EXECUTIVE POWER IS VESTED IN THE PRESIDENT BUT THERE ARE DEEP STATE OPERATIVES WHO FOR THREE YEARS HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT TRY TO LEAK, UNDERMINE, HURT, AND HARM THE ABILITY OF THIS PRESIDENT TO INSTITUTE THIS CHANGE. DO WE WANT TO BE GOVERNED BY AN UNELECTED BUREAUCRACY OR BY A DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED PRESIDENT? IS THE SOLE ISSUE FACING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.>>Chris: THE ONLY POINT I WOULD MAKE IT, AND I HAVE TO MOVE ON, IS THAT IN 2018, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ELECTED

You May Also Like

About the Author: Sam Caldwell

100 Comments

  1. Easy answer Chris! The President doesn't trust the agencies have his best interest, so he goes to people he can trust like Giuliani.

  2. What a nasty senile old man!

    Does he have children that lived? 🤔😳😜

    On the other hand, I'm all salute to Miller. What awesome control, patience and focus he has while getting blasted at with lies from the crooked octogenarian shill!

  3. The publication of
    this book for the English-speaking world requires an introductory
    remark as dealing with Russia’s history and its connection with
    middle Europe – it touches in the main upon only one aspect of the
    European and American West. One could say that it is

    often a
    negative shadow or ‘double ‘ of the West that is shown in this
    book —- which, however, has also influenced the development of
    mankind in recent history. This circumstance does not alter the fact
    that the whole of the English – speaking West has the crucial task
    of leading the fifth cultural epoch, the period of the developing
    consciousness soul, which will run its course for another 1,500
    years. It will therefore be of immense importance whether now and in
    the future the English –

    speaking part of humanity will use its
    time of spiritual leadership for helping all mankind to come to a new
    spirituality, or whether it will contribute to the possibility of a
    final fall into materialism.

    In other words, the central
    question is: Will the West promote a free development of human
    individuality or, alternatively, humanity’s entrapment in a
    dependent and manipulated state? The former possibility is the great
    task of the West for the whole of mankind.

    The second is a
    temptation of power which emerges from the ‘double’ of the true
    being of the English – speaking world, and which constitutes the
    biggest hindrance on the way to the realization of its true task.

    The
    parts of this book which deal with the present activity of this
    ‘double’ can help the western peoples to come to a recognition of
    it.

    Such recognition is in itself already the first step in the
    final overcoming of this disastrous, negative influence. To
    reiterate, the future of the whole of mankind depends on the extent
    to which this

    goal is realized.

    The Spiritual Origins of
    Eastern Europe and the Future Mysteries of

    The Holy Grail by
    Sergei O. Prokofieff

  4. The publication of
    this book for the English-speaking world requires an introductory
    remark as dealing with Russia’s history and its connection with
    middle Europe – it touches in the main upon only one aspect of the
    European and American West. One could say that it is

    often a
    negative shadow or ‘double ‘ of the West that is shown in this
    book —- which, however, has also influenced the development of
    mankind in recent history. This circumstance does not alter the fact
    that the whole of the English – speaking West has the crucial task
    of leading the fifth cultural epoch, the period of the developing
    consciousness soul, which will run its course for another 1,500
    years. It will therefore be of immense importance whether now and in
    the future the English –

    speaking part of humanity will use its
    time of spiritual leadership for helping all mankind to come to a new
    spirituality, or whether it will contribute to the possibility of a
    final fall into materialism.

    In other words, the central
    question is: Will the West promote a free development of human
    individuality or, alternatively, humanity’s entrapment in a
    dependent and manipulated state? The former possibility is the great
    task of the West for the whole of mankind.

    The second is a
    temptation of power which emerges from the ‘double’ of the true
    being of the English – speaking world, and which constitutes the
    biggest hindrance on the way to the realization of its true task.

    The
    parts of this book which deal with the present activity of this
    ‘double’ can help the western peoples to come to a recognition of
    it.

    Such recognition is in itself already the first step in the
    final overcoming of this disastrous, negative influence. To
    reiterate, the future of the whole of mankind depends on the extent
    to which this

    goal is realized.

    The Spiritual Origins of
    Eastern Europe and the Future Mysteries of

    The Holy Grail by
    Sergei O. Prokofieff

  5. I love the last clip of this video where he uses the witness…..the problem is he cut it just before the witness said “it should be investigated”.

  6. Swamp dweller Miller really has some personal issues that he thought was locked up tight in one of his closets.

  7. Chris is rude. I thought better of Fox. No more Chris Wallace for me. Why on earth is he on Fox. He should be on CNN. Lachlan and Paul are taking Fox too far left. Are they trying to lose viewers?

  8. John Bolton could be the leaker, a disgruntled ex-employee. CIA officer stationed at the white house is the so called whistle blower who met with Democrat Schiff to create a false narrative of his second hand hear say information. The list of CIA officers stationed in the White House within several days after the call is small.

  9. Chris Wallace, been around long enough to not care what people think. Hell of an interview, he wants to be this generation's Edward R Murrow.

  10. Imagine being the kind of Crisco-covered slow mutant who thinks repeating "the swamp" in every Youtube video comment is hilarious. Imagine what that person's life must be like.

  11. he is not a real person, look at the size of that head. That alien is kicking to get out…… cant you hear it, let me out, let me out!!!!!!!

  12. They always only give 1 minute to a Republican or Someone who works for the President….!!! 🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷

  13. Why did Trump get his own investigators??? Because 3 years ago we found out we had the MOST CORRUPT FBI CIA EVER, thats why moron Wallace.

  14. The left, including Wallace, only want to silence the truth and push the corrupt narrative. Useful idiots to the 90% media owned by 6 corporations.

  15. The Ukrane prosecutor didn't find Biden did anything wrong because he was fired before the investigation was completed, moron Wallace.

  16. Stephen Miller is a nauseating, obnoxious, petulant jerk. He is EXTREMELY INEFFECTIVE. My question to Fox and all media is, "What is the purpose of having such a propagandizing, "deep state" punk on ever?" He's an evil corrupt childish idiot who should never be allowed near a children's day care. Chris Wallace is wasting time allowing this propagandist any airtime.

  17. If your test for bias is whether or not someone's line of reasoning or inquiry stands to benefit or harm the president, you're biased.

    There is alleged wrongdoing by the president, so it should be investigated through the constitutional channels. Until that is demonstrated, we aren't justified in assuming it is true. That has nothing to do with the Bidens.

    If the Bidens did something wrong, then there are legal ways to investigate that. Until that is demonstrated, we are not justified in assuming it's true. That has nothing to do with the president.

    Chris Wallace asked a fair question paraphrased: "Why did the president send a personal lawyer instead of his government to investigate an American citizen?". Miller refused to answer and instead chose to accuse the Bidens of wrongdoing as if finding it would justify the president's actions if they are accurately understood. It wouldn't. Even if Biden was dirty, that wouldn't justify using his personal lawyers, nor moving the records, nor restricting aid to Ukraine.

  18. IT's so obvious that Chris doesn't want Steven to speak because he can't lead the false narrative. If Chris were smart, which he is FAR FROM, he wouldn't have had a guy on his show that was so intellectually superior to him.

  19. Steven Miller looked like he was going to start crying. Chris held him to the point, while he kept trying to weasel out of it and get off subject.

    Miller was put in his place..not by a liberal but a longtime reputable conservative journalist. And all of you saying that Chris Wallace should be
    fired and etc are a bunch of SNOWFLAKES. He did his job as a journalist. It's just that you can't stomach facts that you don't agree with.

    If there's nothing to hide, then why is the Trump administration keeping the transcript under tight security?

  20. I really do respect Wallaces questioning and his
    Seemingly
    Unbiased inquiries
    I do
    But lately I dont know
    Just seems he is succumbing to what many many people in this country have (knowingly AND UNwittingly) fallen victim to the ever growing pestilence of
    Lilly livered yellow bellied pandering to your master, commie scum Leftism…
    Idk❓❓❓

    Can someone on the LEFT please respond w logical, critical thinking argument(s)❓❓❓

    🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💯💯💯💯💯💯💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️🇺🇸🇺🇸‼️‼️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💯💯💯💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

  21. Wallace you are very ignorant!
    These anchors most of them defend almost with their lives the Bidens and do not want to talk about the alleged corruption, all of them are trying almost to put duck tape in peoples mouth to avoid to talk about the Biden dark side, wondering if somebody pay them a bonus under the table to protect the Biden family when they are on air?

  22. Wow he’s as stupid as he is xenophobic. And bald. Lol 😂 “Deep State”??!! I hope some dude named “bubba” shows you about “Deep state” when you and your accomplices end up in the Pen.

  23. Pay attention kids, this is what journalism looks like. You got to ask the tough questions. Chris Wallace impressed me on this one. With that said Chris I would like to answer the question, why send private attorneys to Ukraine? Because all the interagencys Chris named are full with Intel ops out to get him. Who can he really trust.

  24. Did They Answer the Question? A Simple Tweak for Better Interviews:

    All TV Interviews should post the interviewer's question at the bottom of the screen while the guest is responding so that viewers can more easily remember the interviewer's question and evaluate the degree to which the guest makes an effort to answer it.

    This policy should apply to all interviews and presidential debates.

  25. Wake up people, there's proof and it's being acknowledged by true law abiding patriots that work and serve for the American people. If you still believe POTUS is inocent, you are not a patriot.

  26. Why conversations between leaders need to be overclassified when these discussions supposed to be in support of the nation's foreign policy, security concerns and trading strategies etc. etc.? I understand that sometimes these discussions sensitive issues come up but there is no justification for a so-called “public servant” to have “secret deals” with other foreign leaders for personal gain o political reasons. Lack of organization and protocol in the government are also exposed when this character Miller talked about “leaks”. You might focus on your domestic issues but there are other foreign nations and their respective intelligence services that are taking advantage of your existing chaos. To make matters worse you haven’t been able to have a stable government in almost three years. Critical information from agencies with three-letter acronyms has been neglected and/or challenged and comments from “regimes” were taking into consideration instead. Guys, you really need to smell the coffee and wake up, because it only is going to get worse.

  27. good job Stephen Miller for kicking Wallace in the teeth with facts. Wallace is so obnoxious. His words are laced with bias and lies.

  28. WHY DID CHRIS SAY "DIG" UP DIRT, does that not mean that he is accusing the POTUS of asking them to MANFACTURE when he indeed did no such thing ? ? ?

  29. You never see anyone on CNN ask hard questions to anyone on the left you can’t accuse Fox New of being fake

  30. my god fox, you can't find ANYBODY to replace chris wallace yet? even ben shapiro would be a thousand times better than wallace. just hire ben already and stop with this anti-trump leftism

  31. Lol I love how Stephen Miller is like "You can't talk like this on Fox News" okay so glad Fox News is bucking the propaganda arm stereotype, on the news side

  32. Hahaha! I love it when a power monger like Stephen Miller says "Deep State". He must slap himself when he looks in mirror. He will spill like all the rats on that ship.

  33. Hey Wallace! How about asking Biden tough questions? Also interesting that rules were changed in August so whistle blower doesn’t have to be an eye witness. This rule change denies Trump the right to face his accuser or to call witnesses on his behalf.

  34. That Ukrainian guy they brought up 9n screen is as sketchy as it gets. And for anyone who believes that the current President of Ukraine is not also corrupt, I gotta bridge in Brooklyn to sell them. He may be less corrupt, but its just a relative matter. And the current President of Ukraine is owned by another corrupt Ukrainian oligarch. People in the USA do not understand Ukraine. I have been to Ukraine several times and the layers upon layers of corruption in every level of government are astonishing. As far as governance and corruption goes Ukraine is far closer to an African country like Nigeria or Congo. Please understand what you are dealing with here. Certainly the Bidens and Obama understood. Don't be naive.

  35. What a BS comment by Wallace trying to prove Fox News is unbiased. Chris, the President is the only elected official in the Executive Branch of the US national government. Who ever elected a Vice President?! Yeah its a matter of semantics or subtle definition, but why bring that up? It was childish and stupid and just shows how low class was this entire interview session.

  36. Trump has made many stupid remarks and made a lot of people mad with his arrogant uncompromising style. Nothing wrong with being uncompromising as standing up for your principles, but you must also at least look like you are playing the political game. Too many big egos and too much power and money at stake here. Congressman and Senators will not be pushed around and treated as irrelevant. Trump's style is really what is causing him all these problems. I dont see Vice President Pence acting like this, and I also don't see Trump making it through his presidency without impeachment. Trump's policies have not been bad, but his leadership style is tearing the country apart. Maybe he can get therapy in time to save himself and the country from more of this torture?

  37. "Welcome to the buffet!!!" Loved it!!!! I gotta give credit where credit is do and Chris did a great job!!

  38. Sounds like Chris Wallace should work for CNN. I can't stand to watch Wallace anymore for any amount of time.

  39. Chris is "getting old/losing it." Call it what you will, age, dementia, cantankerousness, desperation, whatever……its not a "good look." 🤔

    Evidence? He brings on Steven Miller to ask him questions that Steven ought to know. First issue/fact to be dealt with: The use of the term, "Whistleblower." Miller makes his assertion based upon what he knows re: the case. Chris asks "how do you know" in a condescending way that negates why he's having Steven on the show, and the arguments commence.
    Really Chris? Better he ask, "is that based on fact, or political, spin-persuasion, Steven?" That would've been a hard, but a more, neutrally based question for a reporter to ask. Chris used to conduct his interviews this way. But LOOK AT HIM NOW. He's rude, militant, and looking like/sounding like a CNN wannabe in some of his segments, especially with his favorite "nemesis," Steven Miller. Been seeing more of this from Chris lately. Wonder why?🤔

    Chris used to "smile" when he asked his tough/hard questions. He was patient. He was courteous. But now, his democrat "DESPERATION" roots are showing. His man Joe Biden, is-on-the-ropes. That, or Chris is under "new mgmt" orders to be more like Shep "i've got pep" Smith and stir up controversy….it's good for ratings. (Hmmm, isn't that a MSNBC/CNN strategy? Yes. Its documented on video….YES!) 😯
    Chris is on a time-schedule-limit here with Steven. That's wrong from the start. Don't bother if you don't have time FOX News. Chris is also on a mission to get his "gotcha's" in. No dealing with Biden angle from Chris, what so ever. Why not Chris/FOX? Don't bother answering. We'll just "interrupt" you and see how YOU like it. 😂😂😂😂
    Chris is trying to get Steven to state Trumps' (& Americas) concern re: the "intelligence community" (IC), and the lack of confidence in it, or WORSE. Then, Chris would likely "attack" such a POV, as if he, Chris Wallace, "Knows better." Little does Chris know, or care, that many US citizens have the many concerns re: IC political agenda. 🤨

    [Epoch Times, Conservative News TV, or something/somebody needs to arise and be ready for the day/hour that FOX goes full-libitard like CNN/MSNBC, and take FOX's place.]

    So in summary, Chris Wallace's Democrat-knickers……are showing, and it doesnt look good. Sad.

  40. Chris Wallace is such a tool. Such a parrot of the left. Every year he gets more brazen and open about his fealty to the Deep State. The must have some really nasty dirt on him. He reminds me of Swallwel, Waters, Shiff, and Schumer all rolled into one big, blind, protectionist, lap dog of Soros.

    SMH …….So very sad

  41. that little bespectacled fkcn jerk Wallace. go to CNN you jerkoff. what an insufferable little prick he is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *